Review and Giveaway : Teach Your Child the Multiplication Tables, Fun, Fast and Easy with Dazzling Patterns, Grids and Tricks!

GIVEAWAY CLOSED!

Growing up, I was never really good at Maths. Until, I had the benefit of getting to know an excellent Maths teacher, who showed me the good side of Maths. It was astounding. I never thought Maths could be so interesting and from then on, each time I found a pattern or a sequence, Maths got easier and easier. I have to say, by the time I ended High School, the only thing I really excelled in, was Maths (and English ~ but that didn’t count somehow).

Now, as a parent, I have to admit, I really suck at teaching Maths. Perhaps I’m too impatient with my kids and think ahead of myself. The easy stuff like Addition and Subtraction was taught with much frustration, on my part, and much dismay, on my kids’ part.  I dreaded the idea of teaching Multiplication and Division! When the book “Teach Your Child the Multiplication Tables, Fun, Fast and Easy with Dazzling Patterns, Grids and Tricks“, arrived, I looked at the front cover with much skepticism. How “fun” could it be?

I completely forgot how amazing it is, when the brain opens up, finds a pattern and starts working furiously at the numbers. Until this book arrived. My 7 year old saw this book and immediately wanted to work on it. I knew he learnt some multiplications at school, but I wasn’t sure how much.

He attacked the first grid….working all the multiplication numbers from 1 to 10. Just like that. I was amazed. He had read and glossed over the book, (I assumed he was just looking at the pictures) earlier…and when he started doing the numbers, he seemed to understand the underlying patterns under each multiplication.

And here I thought I would have a hard time teaching him the Multiplication!

About : The book starts with a story about a Circus in mayhem. The Ringmaster needs the child’s help in counting his animals, but it would take too long to count them, one by one. One needs the magic of multiplication to help him account for all his animals!

Eugenia Francis created this fun, colorful and imaginative way of working with numbers. She spent 15 years developing creative teaching materials. She taught both high school and university students (University of California at Irvine) and mentored other teachers. She received a B.A. and an M.A. in literature from Southern Methodist University and has done graduate work at UCI. Faced with the challenge of teaching her son the multiplication tables, she developed her own innovative method, discovering patterns and tricks to the multiplication tables.

This book also works very well for children diagnosed with ADD/ADHD. Patterns provide structure.  Children with ADD/ADHD need structure. These children have a difficulty memorizing the times tables.  The visual-spatial method of patterns and grids works better.  Patterns also help dyslexic children as they strictly order number sequence.  Special needs children can better visualize and recall where a number is placed if they see a pattern.  Do check out her blog for any updates or tips!

Buy It : There are also other versions, the Teacher’s version and the Spanish version. Wipe-off Learning Aids are also available. The books are available on Amazon, while the books and the Learning Aids are available at Eugenia’s website.

Win It : Goody! Here’s the fun part : 7 very lucky readers will have a chance in winning this. All you have to do is :

  • One entry – Visit www.teachildmath.com and tell us, how old was the author’s son when she decided to create an innovative way of doing the multiplication tables.
  • Three entries - If you tweet this giveaway (please leave us your twitter id)
  • Three entries - If you subscribe to our feed via email (please leave your email add)
  • Entry is open to ALL shipping addresses.
  • Giveaway closes on 4th August 2009 and a winner will be picked using Random.org. We will not be emailing winners, so please make sure you subscribe to our feed or check back here for the winner announcement post.
  • Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Facebook
    • Mixx
    • Google Bookmarks
    • email
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • StumbleUpon
    • Technorati
    • Twitter
    • Share/Bookmark

    Did you enjoy this post?  Subscribe to receive reviews & giveaways updates!

    131 comments so far

    1. MH
      #1

      He was in 3rd grade!

    2. MH
      #2

      I subscribe to the RSS feed and email newsletter

    3. MH
      #3

      newlsetter subscriber

    4. MH
      #4

      email newsletter and RSs subscriber

    5. MH
      #5

      tweeted

    6. MH
      #6

      tweeted link:
      http://twitter.com/cornellian2001/status/2855671746

    7. MH
      #7

      tweeted
      http://twitter.com/cornellian2001/status/2855671746

    8. f.sarah
      #8

      he was seven years old in third grade

    9. Joyce
      #9

      He was in the 3rd grade, so he was about 8 or 9 years old.

    10. Donna K
      #10

      3rd grade-8 or 9.

    11. Donna K
      #11

      subscribed by email.

    12. Donna K
      #12

      2.subscribed by email.

    13. Donna K
      #13

      3.subscribed by email.

    14. Donna K
      #14

      I follow on twitter, and I tweeted.
      http://twitter.com/donnak4/status/2861353511

    15. Donna K
      #15

      2.I follow on twitter, and I tweeted.
      http://twitter.com/donnak4/status/2861353511

    16. Cynthia Mercado
      #16

      Scott was seven years old

    17. Cynthia Mercado
      #17

      I subscribe via email #1

    18. Donna K
      #18

      3.I follow on twitter, and I tweeted.
      http://twitter.com/donnak4/status/2861353511

    19. Cynthia Mercado
      #19

      I subscribe via email #2

    20. Cynthia Mercado
      #20

      I subscribe via email #3

    21. xenia
      #21

      Scott was 7 years old.

    22. xenia
      #22

      I’m an email subscriber #1

    23. xenia
      #23

      I’m an email subscriber #2

    24. xenia
      #24

      I’m an email subscriber #3

    25. Tina H.
      #25

      Her son was 7…

      sweeps4us(at)gmail(dot)com

    26. judy brittle
      #26

      Scott was 7 years old. Thank you!

    27. judy brittle
      #27

      I tweeted #1
      http://twitter.com/kewpiedoll04/status/2862327551

    28. judy brittle
      #28

      I tweeted #2
      http://twitter.com/kewpiedoll04/status/2862327551

    29. judy brittle
      #29

      I tweeted #3
      http://twitter.com/kewpiedoll04/status/2862327551

    30. judy brittle
      #30

      Email subscriber #1

    31. judy brittle
      #31

      Email subscriber #2

    32. judy brittle
      #32

      Email subscriber #3

    33. JamericanSpice
      #33

      Her son was in 3rd grade

    34. JamericanSpice
      #34

      email subscriber

    35. JamericanSpice
      #35

      subscriber

    36. JamericanSpice
      #36

      email subscriber 3

    37. Amber
      #37

      He was in 3rd grade

    38. Amber
      #38

      Subscribing 1

    39. Amber
      #39

      Subscribing 2

    40. Amber
      #40

      Subscribing 3

    41. renee
      #41

      Scott was 7

    42. renee
      #42

      email subscriber 1

    43. renee
      #43

      email subscriber 2

    44. renee
      #44

      email subscriber 3

    45. Tammy Darling
      #45

      he was 7

    46. Tammy Darling
      #46

      email sub 1

    47. Tammy Darling
      #47

      email sub 2

    48. Tammy Darling
      #48

      email sub 3

    49. Jennifer @ Quiverfull Family
      #49

      Scott was in the third grade, and was apparently 7 (that seems so young for 3rd grade!)

    50. Jennifer @ Quiverfull Family
      #50

      I subscribe jennifer at quiverfullfamily dot com

    51. A Scarpa
      #51

      HE was a 7 or 8 yo third grader.

    52. A Scarpa
      #52

      I subscribe no 1

    53. A Scarpa
      #53

      i subscribe no 2

    54. A Scarpa
      #54

      i subscribe no 3

    55. Terra Heck
      #55

      He was 7 years old.

    56. Terra Heck
      #56

      email subscriber #1

    57. Terra Heck
      #57

      email subscriber #2

    58. Terra Heck
      #58

      email subscriber #3

    59. amy
      #59

      Scott was in seven years old and in the third grade. By the way are you original from England – just wondering because you use Maths rather then math and you say “I knew he had learnt” rather then “..he had learned” – both of these, maths and learnt are English versions of the American way of saying things. Just curious!

      great giveaway btw – I am saving the page to get for my snoogs soon – unless I win!

    60. Sweet Serendipity
      #60

      Her son was 7.
      thanks!
      melissa b rich at gmail dot com

    61. Sweet Serendipity
      #61

      I subscribe via email
      melissa b rich at gmail dot com

    62. Sweet Serendipity
      #62

      I tweeted @ptownmoofus
      http://twitter.com/ptownmoofus/status/2870081576

    63. Sweet Serendipity
      #63

      I tweeted @ptownmoofus
      http://twitter.com/ptownmoofus/status/2870081576
      thanks

    64. Sweet Serendipity
      #64

      I tweeted http://twitter.com/ptownmoofus/status/2870081576

      @ptownmoofus
      thanks

    65. Ellen C.
      #65

      He was seven years old. Thanks for the chance.

    66. Cindy-Ann
      #66

      He must have been 7. He was in 3rd grade.

    67. Cindy-Ann
      #67

      Tweeted #1: FAMILY_TIES

    68. Cindy-Ann
      #68

      Tweeted #2: FAMILY_TIES

    69. Cindy-Ann
      #69

      Tweeted #3: FAMILY_TIES

    70. Cindy-Ann
      #70

      Subscribe via email #1

      familytiesandgrowingpains@gmail.com

    71. Cindy-Ann
      #71

      Subscribe via email #2

      familytiesandgrowingpains@gmail.com

    72. Cindy-Ann
      #72

      Subscribe via email #3

      familytiesandgrowingpains@gmail.com

    73. Angie Tejeda
      #73

      Her son was in the third grade and seven years old when she developed this system. Sound’s like a great book. Thanks for the giveaway.

    74. Angie Tejeda
      #74

      e-mail subscriber #2
      yahoo

    75. Angie Tejeda
      #75

      e-mail subscriber #3
      yahoo reader

    76. shelly
      #76

      seven years old

    77. shelly
      #77

      e-mail subscriber #1

    78. shelly
      #78

      e-mail subscriber #2

    79. shelly
      #79

      e-mail subscriber #3

    80. shelly
      #80

      tweeted #1 http://twitter.com/phxbne/status/2872310899

    81. shelly
      #81

      tweeted #2 http://twitter.com/phxbne/status/2872310899

    82. shelly
      #82

      tweeted #3 http://twitter.com/phxbne/status/2872310899

    83. Carrie Anne
      #83

      I can’t believe the odds of coming across this (my husband and I were just talking about helping our 7yo with her times tables).

      I checked the site and it said her son was in grade 3 (which means he would be about 9) but later she references him as being 7.

      Thanks for the great review and giveaway.
      Cheers,

    84. Gahome2mom
      #84

      He was a third grader. Thanks.

      gahome2mom/at/gmail/dot/com

    85. sandra
      #85

      he was a third grader

    86. Gahome2mom
      #86

      email 1
      gahome2mom/at/gmail/dot/com

    87. sandra
      #87

      subscriber

    88. Gahome2mom
      #88

      email 2
      gahome2mom/at/gmail/dot/com

    89. Gahome2mom
      #89

      email 3
      gahome2mom/at/gmail/dot/com

    90. Gahome2mom
      #90

      I had to borrow someone elses tweet because the link was shorter. lol

      @parentreviewers Teach your child multiplication-giveaway http://tiny.cc/ZF3tp

      at gahome2mom
      gahome2mom/at/gmail/dot/com

    91. Gahome2mom
      #91

      twtd 2

      @parentreviewers Teach your child multiplication-giveaway http://tiny.cc/ZF3tp

      at gahome2mom
      gahome2mom/at/gmail/dot/com

    92. Gahome2mom
      #92

      twtd 3

      @parentreviewers Teach your child multiplication-giveaway http://tiny.cc/ZF3tp

      at gahome2mom
      gahome2mom/at/gmail/dot/com

    93. Thao
      #93

      Scott was in the third grade and as a seven year old was developing analytical skills.

      member (dot) thao (at) gmail.com

    94. Thao
      #94

      I subscribe to email updates 1
      member (dot) thao (at) gmail.com

    95. Thao
      #95

      I subscribe to email updates 2
      member (dot) thao (at) gmail.com

    96. Thao
      #96

      I subscribe to email updates 3
      member (dot) thao (at) gmail.com

    97. Thao
      #97

      http://twitter.com/twinpowells/status/2873516651

      I follow in twitter 1
      https://twitter.com/twinpowells
      member (dot) thao (at) gmail.com

    98. Thao
      #98

      http://twitter.com/twinpowells/status/2873516651

      I follow in twitter 2
      https://twitter.com/twinpowells
      member (dot) thao (at) gmail.com

    99. Thao
      #99

      http://twitter.com/twinpowells/status/2873516651

      I follow in twitter 3
      https://twitter.com/twinpowells
      member (dot) thao (at) gmail.com

    100. Christine
      #100

      Her son was in 3rd grade. Thanks for the chance!

    101. Christine
      #101

      I am an email subscriber #1

    102. Christine
      #102

      I am an email subscriber #2

    103. Christine
      #103

      I am an email subscriber #3

    104. Christine
      #104

      Tweeted at entry #1 http://twitter.com/justicecw/status/2876533788

    105. Christine
      #105

      Tweeted entry #2 http://twitter.com/justicecw/status/2876533788

    106. Christine
      #106

      Tweeted entry #3 http://twitter.com/justicecw/status/2876533788

    107. Tia
      #107

      The author’s son was in 3rd grade so he would have been 8 or 9 years old.
      nhmummab@comcast.net

    108. Tia
      #108

      email subscriber
      nhmummab@comcast.net

    109. Tia
      #109

      email subscriber #2
      nhmummab@comcast.net

    110. Tia
      #110

      email subscriber #3
      nhmummab@comcast.net

    111. Katherine M.
      #111

      Scott was 7 years old.

    112. Katherine M.
      #112

      I’m an email subcriber.

    113. alohamolly
      #113

      He was seven years old in third grade.

      alohamolly at gmail dot come

    114. alohamolly
      #114

      He was seven years old in third grade.

      alohamolly at gmail dot com
      (sorry typo error in earlier comment)

    115. alohamolly
      #115

      I subscribed.

    116. alohamolly
      #116

      I subscribed in google reader.

    117. alohamolly
      #117

      I subscribed in email.
      alohamolly at gmail dot com

    118. T.Rochelle
      #118

      Now this sounds like fun. He was 7 years old and my TweetID is Tworkathome.

    119. Angela H.
      #119

      At one point she mentions that he’s in third grade, and then another that he was 7 years old. Pretty smart 7 year old to be in 3rd grade!

    120. Angela H.
      #120

      I’m an email subscriber (1)

    121. Angela H.
      #121

      I’m an email subscriber (2)

    122. Angela H.
      #122

      I’m an email subscriber (3)

    123. Lisa
      #123

      Her son was 7 yrs old.

    124. Lisa
      #124

      I’m a subscriber #1

    125. Lisa
      #125

      I’m a subscriber #2

    126. Lisa
      #126

      I’m a subscriber #3

    127. lea
      #127

      He was 7 yrs old.

    128. lea
      #128

      I’m a subscriber 1

    129. lea
      #129

      I’m a subscriber 2

    130. lea
      #130

      I’m a subscriber 3

    131. cindy-ann
      #131

      hi! i submitted the form to with my info- i am winning # 68. I dont know if it went through. also sent an email. please let me know you get it.

    Leave a Reply





    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    3 Trackbacks/Pings

    LinkWithin Related Stories Widget for Blogs